It depends on everything you've left out. Hi. F4.0 on full frame vs f2.8 cropped? Depth of field should be as you expect -- about on par with a 28-80 f/4 lens. Loading... Unsubscribe from Aiur Productions? Login or Register to display 4 crops from Sony SEL PZ 16-50 F/3.5-5.6 OSS F/10.0 vs. Sony 18-55 F3.5-5.6 SAM F/10.0 for locations Focus Point, Corner (Top Left), Corner Vignetting, Around Center EXIF ( Custom Comparison You can enter 2 photo names from above to compare them side by side: against . Taking into consideration that a 400mm f2.8 (for example) on an 1.5x crop sensor would have an effective FOV as a 600mm lens but would also have an effective aperture of f4 with an ISO degradation of approx 1 stop (or conversely 1 stop slower Shutter time) it would make it almost the same settings as the FF sensor with a TC. Or is there something I'm missing? It is meaningless. f-number is the ratio of focal length to the diameter of the entrance. So, READ IT! Well, depends a bit on what you're planning to shoot. The older prime is smaller, lighter, delivers a better sun star, and has a better lens cap design. I recently rented a Lumix 35-100mm f/2.8 G Vario lens from LensRentals.com so that I could show you the difference between a 70-200mm lens on a full-frame Nikon and a 35-100mm lens on a Micro Four Thirds Lumix, as well as the value of such … Sony 18-105mm F4 G lens vs Sony 28-70mm f3.5-5.6 FE Aiur Productions. This video compares the Bokeh of a Crop frame to a Full frame DSLR. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Given that these are the equivalent 35mm measurements, what would the main difference be between a full frame and an APS-C camera with respect to DOF, low light, etc? This is a subreddit to discuss new cameras and camera comparisons, camera lenses, gear and accessories. Sony 10-18mm f4 vs. Sony FE 35mm f2.8 As per the title I’m looking at two different lenses which are available for similar prices. Cancel … APS-C vs FF. But I do think that I could use the wider f2.8 on a 70-200 or a 24-70 sometimes as the low light is a touch restrictive inside, even at higher ISO's. I was originally planning to get Sigma 14-24 f2.8 DG DN but then decided to give 12-24 f4 a try. Related Comparisons: Samsung 18-55 vs. Sony E.16-50 Sharpness at 50mm. I do not have the 17-55 F2.8 but if you want to compare this link may help. One of the main nudges for crop sensor shooters to jump to full frame is because of the larger control over DOF and low light performance. EVIL, SLR, DSLR, point and shoot, rangefinder, mirrorless, handheld cams etc. The exposure time will be the same for both though. Two things which seemingly are the same, but aren’t. I currently shoot Canon APS-C, which comes along with a 1.6x crop factor. Full frame usually has better high iso capabilities, so the smaller aperture shouldn't do much bad. A full frame camera with good high iso performance will be better for indoor than a crop sensor. Is the full frame cameras iso performance 1 stop better than the crop sensor camera? Here's a crop from this 22MP image at 100%: Crop from above image at 100%, shot at f/8 at ISO 100 on a 5D Mark III. Hi. In other words, 35mm full frame equivalent fields of view will be larger than the quoted focal length for any given GF lens. 1; 2; First Prev 2 of 2 Go to page. It was a 10 year olds playing a flag football game at night. I am considering either buying a Sony 18-105 f4 because I need the zoom capabilities and it fits in my budget. I'm currently shooting a Sony a7ii and I have received two lenses from my work (tameron 24-70 f2.8 Canon mount and Canon 50mm f1.8). I have a 17-50 f2.8, which gives me a 35mm equivalent lens of 28-80mm f4.5. But Sony's lenses are so expensive. Cookies help us deliver our Services. At regular close-focus distance at 70mm on full-frame, Canon 24-70 f/4 IS. The big benefit to FF re: low light is primarily much larger "pixels" on the sensor, which can gather more light. The new Nikon Z 24-200mm f4.0-6.3 VR performed very well in this long-distance test although up to 50mm focal length the Nikon Z 24-70mm f4.0 S is sharper right up into the extreme corners of a full-frame sensor. I show you the bokeh or background blur for 3 different aperture settings. Crop + F2.8 v Full Frame + F4. See introduction at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_factor . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_factor. Are they the same focal length? Press J to jump to the feed. Nor do I know which camera(s) so their maybe 50 other reasons to favour that full frame with a slower (f/4) lens. It has the sub info/rules that aren't easily found on the app or mobile, as well as links to the sub Wiki and warnings to Surveyors /YouTubers/Bloggers/Article Writers/Intagrammers/Course Creators/App Developers and other attention-seekers (short version- don't link to your content in a standalone thread or you'll get reported and banned). F1.8 on FF is f1.8). As you can see the 24-70 on full frame (1DsIII) and the 17-55 on a 50D show very clear differences. I know it's a weird question but diving into everything would make this a longish short story so I hope you can give me some guidance based on these facts . Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. To put it bluntly- if you are looking to buy a full frame rated lens to use on your crop sensor camera, as long as it is compatible for your brand and mount, the full frame lens will take the exact same photo as a crop sensor lens insofar as the focal length, aperture, lighting, etc. f2.8 is much heavier than an f4; f2.8 is much more expensive than f4; An f4 lens with VR will actually be able to shoot in darker conditions than an f2.8 without VR. Still have a couple of weeks before the return window closes. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I am in the position where I can choose to shoot on a full frame with a lens that is f4 or I can choose a cropped sensor with f2.8 will they be the same (due to equivalency)? 8? And actually a little worse? F/4 is one stop less than f/2.8. Not to mention the bokeh possible on FF is shallower than crop (f1.8 on crop is about f2.8. What that means is that, although your lens’ focal lengths and apertures are accurate, your cameras 35mm equivalent focal lengths and apertures should be multiplied by that crop factor. A recent example of something I shot was last weekend. Before I got the job I didn't use autofocus, but I in my new job I do event photography, so sometimes dimly lit and some movement. ... will they be the same (due to equivalency)? You can not “zoom with your feet”, because if you change your position, your perspective changes. But my hesitation was, would the 2.8 tamerons low light capabilities be canceled by the crop factor and would I be better just to keep my Sony and buy a f4 lens. I like it so far, but still need to do FM decenter test. Also, I find crop sensors in low light just don't cut it without the F2.8. F1.8 on FF is f1.8) TLDR: APS-C f2.8 vs FF f4… As a mostly full-frame shooter, I’d prefer the Canon 15mm f/2.8 fisheye prime lens unless of course I started grabbing a crop-body more often. Aperture doesn't mean much by itself. But it also has shallow-depth-of-field. The image above certainly has nice, smooth bokeh. But, I don't know their focal lengths or conditions of the shoot. I’m wanting a better lens for landscape/architecture photography as I’m going on a road trip soon where there’ll be some scenic landscapes. If it's a crop sensor, I prefer F2.8, because it provides the FF equivalent of F4 in terms of DoF and Bokeh. Are you shooting shots where you need f2. If this is 6" (15cm) wide on your screen, the full image would print at 40 x 60" (1 x 1.5 meters)! Tested Apertures … S Doesn't the crop factor mean that 2.8 is equal to f4? I find I use my 16-35 F2.8 II a lot more on my 7D than my 24-70 F2.8. Crop Sensor: A crop sensor camera, like on many DSLRs (which use the APS-C size) or the Four Thirds sensor (used in Four Thirds DSLRs and Micro 4/3 mirrorless cameras), is simply a sensor that is smaller in physical size than a full frame sensor. 2.2 Sharpness / Piqué vs Sony 12-24mm F4 and Sigma 14-24 F2.8 DG DN Art. Sony PZ E 18-105mm F4 G OSS on a full frame; Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM; Sony FE 24-70mm F4 Zeiss OSS; Sony FE 24-105 F4 G OSS; Sony FE 24-240mm F3.5-F6.3; Sony FE 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 (Kit lens) Sony FE PZ 28-135mm F4 G OSS; Sony FE 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 G OSS; Sony FE70-200 F2.8 GM & TC1.4 / TC2.0; Sony FE 100-400mm GM OSS F4.5-F5.6; Sony FE 70-200 F4 G Or I sell the camera and buy a Canon m50. Before we can go much further, we need to recap on Depth-of-Field 1. shallow depth of field is NOT the same as bokeh. In my experience, the depth of field of an f4 lens on full frame is about the same as f2.8 on crop. You need to provide more info to get a good answer. A 2.8 24mm lens will have worse bokeh than an f4 70 200 at 200. TLDR: APS-C f2.8 vs FF f4? Discussion in 'Canon EOS' started by anuragagnihotri, Apr 21, 2010. anuragagnihotri. I have shot with both systems for a couple years but never side by side. You are confusing focal length and aperture wrt crop factor. One of the main nudges for crop sensor shooters to jump to full frame is because of the larger control over DOF and low light performance. Both cameras I can afford with some nice primes, but when it comes to zooms, I could buy the 7D2 with the 17-55/F2.8 and still spend less then buying a FF with a F4 zoom. The Sony GM is as its best between 18- 24mm whereas 24mm is the weakest on both Sony FE 12-24mm F4 G, and the Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN Art With a zoom, the perspectiv… Post reviews, articles, and videos of products, unboxings, etc. Taking a look at one of the most common questions that I get asked - is it okay to use APS-C lenses on your full frame Sony camera? hi, have psted couple of threads asking various things about lenses....i'm considering 70-200 F4...and i want to know the difference between background blur when its mounted on a crop body vis a vis a full frame body. Let’s assume for the sake of this post that both lenses are of “equal quality”. No, they won't be the same. VR would make indoor and night shots a few stops better which negates the aperture differences. You can 'compensate' for the crop factor by zooming out some more with your feet (walking further away from your subject). Not to mention the bokeh possible on FF is shallower than crop (f1.8 on crop is about f2.8. Thread starter akr; Start date Sep 18, 2011; Prev. But from all I've tested adapters aren't good enough so I would need native lenses. Press J to jump to the feed. Why? So on that note, if you are one of those who say things like “give it some bokeh”, then you need to stop. I'm looking for good lowlight performance and fast AF in all situations. If you'll be shooting in low light conditions, or if you have to shoot things that move really fast, I'd recommend the 2.8. Are the lenses both as sharp as each other? Full Frame: A full frame camera has a sensor that is the same physical size as that of a frame of 35mm film.That is, 36mm wide x 24mm high. That would be my main lens to compare with the 8-15mm as I … From what i … I am in the position where I can choose to shoot on a full frame with a lens that is f4 or I can choose a cropped sensor with f2.8 will they be the same (due to equivalency)? Sensor performance, DOF, low light? By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. The rule of thumb is "one stop" better noise performance: ie a FF camera at ISO 6400 would produce the same image as an APS-C camera at ISO 3200 in respect to noise. If you plan to use the 24-70 f2.8 on an APS-C body I would suggest that you might not find it is the best focal length range. Assuming similar settings. Do they both have IS/VR as this will make a huge difference. **READ THIS BEFORE POSTING** Sort by "HOT" and you'll see a "READ HERE FIRST" post pinned to the top of the sub.